APVMA
  • Home
  • |
  • Publications
  • |
  • Forms
  • |
  • Media
  • |
  • Employment Opportunities
  • |
  • About Us
  • |
  • Contact Us
SearchSubmit
  • Search PUBCRIS for Registered Chemicals
  • |
  • Search for Permits
  • |
  • Ask a Question
Chemical Users
Community
Industry
Activities
  • Advice summaries
  • Active constituents
  • Application summaries
  • APVMA Gazette
  • Chemical reviews
  • Legislation
  • Quality assurance & compliance

Streptomycin, dihydrostreptomycin, streptomycin/penicillin and dihydrostreptomycin/penicillin review history and regulatory outcomes

Nomination for review

In 1997 the APVMA (formerly the NRA) began the review of (dihydro) streptomycin and (dihydro) streptomycin/penicillin combination products following advice from the Meat Research Corporation and the Victorian Department of Natural Resources and Environment of concerns about the efficacy of combination products and the possible risk to the Australian trade in meat from streptomycin residues in meat and offal from treated food-producing animals.

Final review and outcomes

In 1999 the APVMA released the (Dihydro) Streptomycin/ Penicillin Combination Products and (Dihydro) Streptomycin Products Review Final Report. The APVMA was not satisfied that the use of (dihydro) streptomycin/penicillin in combination was as effective as penicillin alone, nor that the continued use (dihydro) streptomycin products, alone or in combination, would not be an undue risk to Australian trade in meat and offal.

The key findings of the Final Review Report were:

  • Combination injectable (dihydro) streptomycin/penicillin products should no longer be used in food-producing animals. Using the combination of (dihydro) streptomycin and penicillin, when penicillin alone was an effective treatment, had the potential to lead to overuse of the (dihydro) streptomycin and promote antibiotic resistance.
  • The use of (dihydro) streptomycin/penicillin combination products, even at recommended label rates, had the potential to lead to residue violations.
  • Injectable products containing (dihydro) streptomycin should no longer be used in food-producing animals, as there was insufficient data to establish suitable withholding periods. The continued use of these products in food-producing animals could not be supported on the grounds of residues and trade.

In the Final Review Report the APVMA recommended:

  • Cancelling the use of (dihydro) streptomycin and penicillin in combination, for use in food-producing animals.
  • Cancelling the use of (dihydro) streptomycin in food-producing animals. The APVMA will only allow limited off-label use of these products under veterinary permit. For more information see the advisory note below.
  • Strengthening warnings on product labels. Amending product labels to specify that (dihydro) streptomycin and (dihydro) streptomycin/penicillin combination products should not be used in food-producing animals, with effect from 30 Jun 1999.
  • Withdrawing the Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for poultry. The review found that the residue data did not support the existing MRLs for poultry.

On 1 October 1999, the APVMA cancelled the registration of four (dihydro) streptomycin/ penicillin combination products at the request of the registrants.

Advisory note: the APVMA believes using (dihydro) streptomycin products for certain uses under veterinary permit is necessary on grounds of human health, animal welfare and trade. These uses include removal of the carrier state of leptospirosis in cattle, pigs and sheep, the treatment of campylobacteriosis in bulls and the treatment of live cattle for export to countries who require it. For these conditions the APVMA has issued permits for the off-label use of (dihydro) streptomycin.

For more information please contact the Chemical Review Program on (02) 6210 4749 or by email to chemrev@apvma.gov.au

Back to top
  • Feedback
  • |
  • Subscribe to Mail List
  • |
  • Copyright
  • |
  • Privacy
  • |
  • Sitemap
  • |
  • Disclaimer