Return to MORAG homepage
Ag Volume 2
Printable version Printable version A link to a PDF document
Category 2
 
horizontal rule
 

Category 2 application
Approval of a new active constituent and registration of an associated chemical product: Modular assessment

 
   
Table of Contents
   
 
 
 

1.   DEFINITION

Schedule 6 of the Agvet Code Regulations describes a Category 2 application as:

Application for approval of an active constituent contained in a chemical product, registration of the associated chemical product and approval of the product label requiring less than full assessment of the active constituent and chemical product.

A Category 2 application is for registration of a new product, containing new active constituent/s, where a full (comprehensive) assessment is NOT required for data Parts 2 to 81.

Category 2 is a modular category. Data requirements, the fee payable and timeframe for assessment depend on which of the modules are required for a particular application. The modules are described in Module levels for modular categories in Volume 3, and also in the guidelines included with the examples later in this chapter.

1.1.   Application types

The following types of agricultural applications are eligible for assessment under Category 2:

  • a new chemically synthesised active constituent and a product containing that active constituent for use as a rodenticide in agricultural, commercial and industrial buildings for use in bait stations only, with restrictions on use around animals and food:

    • this application would be assessed under Category 2 because residues assessment would not be required
  • a new biologically-derived active constituent and a product containing that active constituent for use as an insecticide in vegetables. The active constituent is the virus toxin of the intended pest-specific virus:
    • this application would be assessed under Category 2 because a full residues assessment would not be required if the toxicological data demonstrated negligible mammalian toxicity. In addition, it could be possible that a reduced environmental assessment would be suitable depending on the nature of the toxin
  • a new biologically-derived active constituent and a product containing that active constituent for use as an insecticide in pome fruit orchards. The active constituent is the spores of a fungus pathogenic to insects:
    • this application would be assessed under Category 2 for the same reasons as given above
  • a product containing a new active constituent which is a commonly-used household or industrial chemical with a history of safe use.

2.   REQUIREMENTS

When making a Category 2 application for approval of an active constituent and registration of a new product, applicants must provide:

2.1.   Combined Application Form and Overview

The Application Form and Application Overview have been combined into a single document (KP25F03) which is available on the APVMA website. A single unbound copy of the combined document must be provided to the APVMA.

The Application Form is divided into separate sections for application for registration of the product and approval of the active constituent.

The Application Overview section of the combined document is in the form of a template. Applicants may use this template, or may submit their own Application Overview although this must conform to the instructions and format provided in Part 1 – Application overview in Volume 3.

Sub-parts 1.1–1.10 of the Application Overview must all be completed.

When the product is only for use in a non-food situation, sub-part 1.5 will only need to state this fact and a separate Part 5 (Residues and Trade) need not be submitted.

2.2.   Data

Category 2 is a modular category, therefore data studies, fee and timeframe are determined by the module levels required for product assessment, which themselves are determined by the type of product and the situations in which the product will be used.

All applications made under Category 2, except for secondary applications, will normally require submission of data for the product, relating to:

Chemistry and Manufacture

Part 2

Efficacy and Safety

Part 8

Where applicable, the following data Parts may also be required:

Toxicology data for both the active constituent and the product, including poisons scheduling

Part 3

Metabolism and Kinetics

Part 4

Residues and Trade

Part 5

Occupational Health and Safety

Part 6

Environment

Part 7

Other Trade Aspects

Part 9

Special Data Requirements

Part 10

Note: The Parts relate to Volume 3: Data requirements and guidelines. Further information on data requirements is provided in that volume.

2.3.   Label

Applicants must provide a label with the Application Form and Overview. The APVMA recommends that the label be in draft form so that it can be amended if necessary, however applicants may choose to submit the marketed product label (MPL).

Applicants may provide the draft label as either:

  • two copies of the text label (TXL) printed on paper; or
  • an e-label on CD. The CD must be attached to the Application Form and Overview and not submitted separately or by email.

The draft label must include all label components ie primary pack, immediate container and leaflet, as relevant.

All parts of the draft label must be in accordance with the latest editions of the:

After the APVMA has assessed the draft label and is satisfied that the label is acceptable, the APVMA will ask the applicant to provide an e-label of the MPL for approval. If the MPL is acceptable and all other matters relevant to the application are acceptable, the APVMA will approve the label and grant the application.

Refer to Label Approval Process in Volume 5 for further information.

2.4.   Fee and timeframe

Category 2 is a modular category and therefore the fee payable and timeframe depend on which of the modules are required for assessment of the application.

The fee for a Category 2 application will always include the fees for Module 1 (Screening), plus the relevant Finalisation module (11.1, 11.2, or 11.4).

A fee must accompany a Category 2 application. Applicants may provide the complete fee when submitting the application, or may choose to provide $460 (Screening module fee) when submitting the application and provide the remainder of the fee when requested by the APVMA, after the application passes screening.

To calculate the timeframe assigned to an application, the longest assessment period for the specific data modules should be added to the timeframe for the relevant finalisation module.

The fee and timeframe for each application may be calculated by reference to Module levels for modular categories in Volume 3.

2.5.   Public consultation

Prior to approval of the active constituent and registration of the product, the APVMA will conduct a round of public consultation. This is normally by means of publication of a Gazette Notice which notifies the public that the APVMA has published on the website a notice called a Public Release Summary (PRS) which invites comment on the APVMA’s intention to approve the active constituent and register the product.

If the product is intended for use in crops or situations that will result in residues in food or animal commodities, the PRS invites comment on whether use of the product would unduly prejudice overseas trade.

2.6.   Data protection

Module 12 (Data Protection) is required for all applications which are assessed under a modular category, where the applicant provides data to the APVMA that are eligible for protection. This applies to the great majority of applications in this category. Publicly available data are ineligible for protection.

Module 12 covers the cost of steps required to protect data and is mandatory for all applications which provide data eligible for protection. Applicants cannot waive the right to protected data before the APVMA grants an application.

Applicants must provide a data list, including an entry for all information that meets the definition given on the APVMA website data protection page at http://www.apvma.gov.au/registration/data_protection.shtml . This requirement applies irrespective of whether an application is eligible for data protection.

Module 12 also applies to secondary applications which rely on protected data for the primary application, or which require assessment of data that are not common with the primary application. Data related only to the secondary product must be included on a separate data list and must not be included on the data list of the primary product application. Data related only to the secondary product cannot be considered required and relied on to grant the primary application and therefore will not receive protection if provided in this manner.

3.   GUIDELINES

3.1.   Secondary applications

When applications are simultaneously submitted to the APVMA for registration of more than one new product containing new active constituents, one product application may be assessed as the primary application and the others as secondary applications.

Products containing more than one new active constituent, except for veterinary vaccines, direct-fed microbials and enzymes, will require more than one application because each active constituent will require separate chemistry and toxicological assessments.

A secondary application exists when an applicant has another product containing the same active constituent/s as the primary product undergoing registration at the same time, and the assessment of some of the data for the first product can be used for both products. The product requiring the highest level of assessment should always be presented as the primary application.

Where the method of application and use pattern are the same, the product with the highest concentration or application rate should be presented as the primary application. Both the primary application and the secondary applications, involving modular assessments of data which are not common with the primary application, can be assessed under Category 2. When technical assessment is not required for a secondary application, only Modules 1 (Screening) and 11.4 (Finalisation) will apply, and where relevant, Module 12 (Data Protection). Secondary applications will only be finalised once the primary product application is finalised.

4.   EXAMPLES

The following examples show how data requirements can be determined by using Volume 3: Data requirements and guidelines.

In these examples applicants must submit the relevant data as indicated or must provide valid scientific argument why certain data should not be required. If the APVMA accepts that the scientific argument is valid, those data need not be submitted.

 

Example 1: Application is made for approval of a new chemically-synthesised active constituent and registration of a product containing that active constituent, for use as a rodenticide in agricultural, commercial and industrial buildings for use in bait stations only, with restrictions on use around animals and food.

Data requirements are expected to be drawn from:

Application Overview Part 1
Chemistry and Manufacture Part 2
Toxicology Part 3
Metabolism and Kinetics Part 4
Occupational Health and Safety Part 6
Environment Part 7
Efficacy and Safety Part 8

The following modules are expected to apply:

Module Description Fee
Module 1 Screening
$460
Module 2.1 Chemistry – Level 1
$2,960
Module 3.1 2 Toxicology – Level 1
$17,720
Module 4 Toxicology – Scheduling
$3,380
Module 6.1 OHS – Level 1
$3,920
Module 7.1 Environment – Level 1
$11,460
Module 8.1 Efficacy and Safety – Level 1
$1,695
Module 11.1 Finalisation – Type 1
$2,025
Module 12 Data Protection
$155
 
Total fee:
$43,775
 
Timeframe:
15 months

 

Example 2: Application is made for approval of a new chemically-synthesised active constituent and registration of a product containing that active constituent for use as an anti-fouling paint on boats.

Data requirements are expected to be drawn from:

Application Overview Part 1
Chemistry and Manufacture Part 2
Toxicology Part 3
Metabolism and Kinetics Part 4
Occupational Health and Safety Part 6
Environment Part 7
Efficacy and Safety Part 8

The following modules are expected to apply:

Module Description Fee
Module 1 Screening
$460
Module 2.1 Chemistry – Level 1
$2,960
Module 3.2 Toxicology – Level 2
$13,290
Module 4 Toxicology – Scheduling
$3,380
Module 6.1 OHS – Level 1
$3,920
Module 7.1 Environment – Level 1
$11,460
Module 8.1 Efficacy and Safety – Level 1
$1,695
Module 11.1 Finalisation – Type 1
$2,025
Module 12 Data Protection
$155
 
Total fee:
$39,345
 
Timeframe:
15 months

 

Example 3: Application is made for approval of a new commodity chemical-type active constituent and registration of a product containing that active constituent, for use as a post-harvest fungicide for fruit. The chemical is currently used as a sanitiser in non-agricultural areas, it is considered exempt from poisons scheduling, and a Table 5 entry in the MRL Standard is proposed.

Data requirements are expected to be drawn from:

Application Overview Part 1
Chemistry and Manufacture Part 2
Toxicology Part 3
Metabolism and Kinetics Part 4
Residues and Trade Part 5
Occupational Health and Safety Part 6
Environment Part 7
Efficacy and Safety Part 8

The following modules are expected to apply:

Module Description Fee
Module 1 Screening
$460
Module 2.1 Chemistry – Level 1
$2,960
Module 3.3 Toxicology – Level 3
$2,635
Module 5.4 Residues – Level 4
$2,025
Module 6.1 OHS – Level 1
$3,920
Module 7.2 Environment – Level 2
$2,960
Module 8.1 Efficacy and Safety – Level 1
$1,695
Module 11.1 Finalisation – Type 1
$2,025
Module 12 Data Protection
$155
 
Total fee:
$18,835
 
Timeframe:
15 months

 

Example 4: Application is made for approval of a new chemical-type active constituent and registration of a product containing that active constituent for use as an adjuvant with other pesticides on crops. The active constituent is already present in currently registered products as a non-active constituent (eg wetter, spreader, UV inhibitor).

Data requirements are expected to be drawn from:

Application Overview Part 1
Chemistry and Manufacture Part 2
Toxicology Part 3
Metabolism and Kinetics Part 4
Residues and Trade Part 5
Occupational Health and Safety Part 6
Environment Part 7
Efficacy and Safety Part 8

The following modules are expected to apply:

Module Description Fee
Module 1 Screening
$460
Module 2.2 Chemistry – Level 2
$2,025
Module 3.3 Toxicology – Level 3
$2,635
Module 5.4 Residues – Level 4
$2,025
Module 6.1 OHS – Level 1
$3,920
Module 7.1 Environment – Level 1
$11,460
Module 8.1 Efficacy and Safety – Level 1
$1,695
Module 11.1 Finalisation – Type 1
$2,025
Module 12 Data Protection
$155
 
Total fee:
$26,400
 
Timeframe:
15 months

 

Example 5: Application is made for approval of a new biologically derived active constituent and registration of a product containing that active constituent for use as an insecticide in vegetables. The active constituent is a pest-specific virus.

Data requirements are expected to be drawn from:

Application Overview Part 1
Chemistry and Manufacture Part 2
Toxicology Part 3
Occupational Health and Safety Part 6
Environment Part 7
Efficacy and Safety Part 8

The following modules are expected to apply:

Module Description Fee
Module 1 Screening
$460
Module 2.2 Chemistry – Level 2
$2,025
Module 3.3 Toxicology – Level 3
$2,635
Module 6.1 OHS – Level 1
$3,920
Module 7.1 Environment – Level 1
$11,460
Module 8.1 Efficacy and Safety – Level 1
$1,695
Module 11.1 Finalisation – Type 1
$2,025
Module 12 Data Protection
$155
 
Total fee:
$24,375
 
Timeframe:
15 months

 

Example 6: Application is made for approval of a new biologically derived active constituent and registration of a product containing that active constituent for use as an insecticide in ornamentals. The active constituent is a relatively unpurified extract from the leaves of a particular species of tree and the active constituent is adequately characterised. In this instance the active constituent is almost equivalent to a new synthesised chemical because very little may be known about the extract’s properties depending on the chemical composition of the extract.

Data requirements are expected to be drawn from:

Application Overview Part 1
Chemistry and Manufacture Part 2
Toxicology Part 3
Metabolism and Kinetics Part 4
Occupational Health and Safety Part 6
Environment Part 7
Efficacy and Safety Part 8

The following modules are expected to apply:

Module Description Fee
Module 1 Screening
$460
Module 2.1 Chemistry – Level 1
$2,960
Module 3.2 Toxicology – Level 2
$13,290
Module 4 Toxicology – Scheduling
$3,380
Module 6.1 OHS – Level 1
$3,920
Module 7.1 Environment – Level 1
$11,460
Module 8.1 Efficacy and Safety – Level 1
$1,695
Module 11.1 Finalisation – Type 1
$2,025
Module 12 Data Protection
$155
 
Total fee:
$39,345
 
Timeframe:
15 months

 

horizontal rule

Footnotes

  1. Parts 2–8 of Volume 3: Data requirements and guidelines.
  2. Because the product will not be used on food crops nor is it likely to result in food contamination, there is no need to set an acceptable daily intake (ADI) (see Part 3 – Toxicology in Volume 3: Data requirements and guidelines). Therefore, certain types of data used to determine the ADI (eg long-term rat toxicity studies) may not be necessary and Module 3.2 may be sufficient. However, applicants should note that all available relevant toxicological data should be provided.

    In addition, if the applicant is likely to request a label claim for use in food situations at a later date, it is in the applicant’s interest to provide all data in the first application and pay the fee for a Module 3.1 assessment, rather than providing the data at a later date with a food use application and paying two Module 3.2 fees (ie one for the current application and one for the second application).

Revision history

Revision Date Description of Revision
1 July 2005 First edition
1 October 2005

Second edition

  • hyperlinks inserted to Labelling Code, SUSDP and FAISD handbook.
1 April 2006

Third edition

  • paragraph 2: added reference to data list
  • paragraph 2.6: clarified data protection for secondary applications.
1 July 2007

Fourth edition

  • paragraph 2.4: revised label requirements
  • edit paragraph 2.6 re provision of data lists for chemistry data
  • minor text edits.
 
Version 4 - Current at: 01-Jul-2007

Printable version Printable version A link to a PDF document
Top of page
More information on page
MORAG home page MORAG home page